<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion: Health care industry must conform to the laws of economics</title>
	<atom:link href="/2015/01/07/opinion-health-care-industry-must-conform-to-the-laws-of-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/01/07/opinion-health-care-industry-must-conform-to-the-laws-of-economics/</link>
	<description>Colorado Health News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lis</title>
		<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/01/07/opinion-health-care-industry-must-conform-to-the-laws-of-economics/#comment-20649</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthnewscolorado.org/?p=16206#comment-20649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, we do have too much insurance.  We have a model for decreasing costs without rationing, but it is generally ignored, and Obamacare made it more difficult.  A fairly recent Rand Corp study found that those who used high-deductible insurance and HSAs spent 21% less.  Their spending was their choice; not the choice of a government or insurance company.  When people spend their own money, they spend wisely.  We could control a lot of cost simply by disconnecting insurance companies from providers - no more secret, market-inhibiting contracts, and no more secret prices.  Prior to Obamacare, a young man could have a high-deductible plan for less than $50 (my zipcode).  That plan is now more than $300 but it does include free oil changes and free tuneups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, we do have too much insurance.  We have a model for decreasing costs without rationing, but it is generally ignored, and Obamacare made it more difficult.  A fairly recent Rand Corp study found that those who used high-deductible insurance and HSAs spent 21% less.  Their spending was their choice; not the choice of a government or insurance company.  When people spend their own money, they spend wisely.  We could control a lot of cost simply by disconnecting insurance companies from providers &#8211; no more secret, market-inhibiting contracts, and no more secret prices.  Prior to Obamacare, a young man could have a high-deductible plan for less than $50 (my zipcode).  That plan is now more than $300 but it does include free oil changes and free tuneups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephotoguy</title>
		<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/01/07/opinion-health-care-industry-must-conform-to-the-laws-of-economics/#comment-20629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thephotoguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthnewscolorado.org/?p=16206#comment-20629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Miller must be quite wealthy, and I wish him luck when his health fails and he discovers he has to sell the McMansion and the Mercedes to pay for his cancer treatment, or that artificial heart valve. &quot;Let the market decide&quot; can be made to work, though it&#039;s not an ideal philosophy, if that market includes highly knowledgeable consumers, tight regulation of suppliers and providers, and widely-disseminated information about costs at every step of the way.

None of those things characterize our current health care system, even under the ACA.

Most consumers have no idea what health care costs beyond the occasional bottle of pain reliever, not just because their insurance coverage insulates them (for those with insurance, that insulation is quite real), but because those costs are often nowhere to be found until the bill arrives from the surgeon or hospital. Most members of the general public have no knowledge of medicine, and thus no knowledge of what their physician is telling them beyond &quot;Is it serious?&quot;

Regulation of the health care industry is a pleasant fantasy, and I admit I engage in it occasionally, but it is merely that – a fantasy. Not many physicians are interested in seeing their incomes regulated, nor are the manufacturers of health care-related devices, from heart valves to crutches, to orthopedic shoes. Any serious suggestion of regulating devices, prices for procedures, room occupancy costs for in-patient hospital stays, etc., is routinely met with howls of outrage, predictions of the apocalypse, and stories of grandmothers dying at the side of the road because their medical provider went out of business due to the crushing burden of regulation, which typically would involve, for example, publicizing their prices BEFORE procedures were performed or hospital rooms booked.

And finally, of course, largely because of our ad hoc insurance system, and the insulation it provides to patients, most people have no idea what, for example, an office visit, treatment of a sprained ankle, or repair of a broken bone from a ski accident, actually costs. Nearly 40 years ago, I was being charged more than $5 for a single aspirin in what was supposedly a &quot;nonprofit&quot; hospital. Things have only gotten worse since then.

The &quot;market&quot; Mr. Miller describes for health care is as much a fantasy as any expert&#039;s vision of reforming our current system so that affordable health care is available to everyone. What Mr. Miller proposes is health care for those who can afford it, illness and death for those who cannot. Those are interesting values he&#039;s putting on display.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Miller must be quite wealthy, and I wish him luck when his health fails and he discovers he has to sell the McMansion and the Mercedes to pay for his cancer treatment, or that artificial heart valve. &#8220;Let the market decide&#8221; can be made to work, though it&#8217;s not an ideal philosophy, if that market includes highly knowledgeable consumers, tight regulation of suppliers and providers, and widely-disseminated information about costs at every step of the way.</p>
<p>None of those things characterize our current health care system, even under the ACA.</p>
<p>Most consumers have no idea what health care costs beyond the occasional bottle of pain reliever, not just because their insurance coverage insulates them (for those with insurance, that insulation is quite real), but because those costs are often nowhere to be found until the bill arrives from the surgeon or hospital. Most members of the general public have no knowledge of medicine, and thus no knowledge of what their physician is telling them beyond &#8220;Is it serious?&#8221;</p>
<p>Regulation of the health care industry is a pleasant fantasy, and I admit I engage in it occasionally, but it is merely that – a fantasy. Not many physicians are interested in seeing their incomes regulated, nor are the manufacturers of health care-related devices, from heart valves to crutches, to orthopedic shoes. Any serious suggestion of regulating devices, prices for procedures, room occupancy costs for in-patient hospital stays, etc., is routinely met with howls of outrage, predictions of the apocalypse, and stories of grandmothers dying at the side of the road because their medical provider went out of business due to the crushing burden of regulation, which typically would involve, for example, publicizing their prices BEFORE procedures were performed or hospital rooms booked.</p>
<p>And finally, of course, largely because of our ad hoc insurance system, and the insulation it provides to patients, most people have no idea what, for example, an office visit, treatment of a sprained ankle, or repair of a broken bone from a ski accident, actually costs. Nearly 40 years ago, I was being charged more than $5 for a single aspirin in what was supposedly a &#8220;nonprofit&#8221; hospital. Things have only gotten worse since then.</p>
<p>The &#8220;market&#8221; Mr. Miller describes for health care is as much a fantasy as any expert&#8217;s vision of reforming our current system so that affordable health care is available to everyone. What Mr. Miller proposes is health care for those who can afford it, illness and death for those who cannot. Those are interesting values he&#8217;s putting on display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
