<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill allowing public funding for IUDs advances in Colorado House</title>
	<atom:link href="/2015/02/25/bill-allowing-public-funding-for-iuds-advances-in-colorado-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/02/25/bill-allowing-public-funding-for-iuds-advances-in-colorado-house/</link>
	<description>Colorado Health News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephotoguy</title>
		<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/02/25/bill-allowing-public-funding-for-iuds-advances-in-colorado-house/#comment-21101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thephotoguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthnewscolorado.org/?p=16385#comment-21101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My pesonal favorite line in the piece is, &quot;Lawmakers did not press him on whether he supported unintended pregnancies for teen mothers as a method for boosting population.&quot;

Mike Norton, of course is not at all interested in &quot;defending freedom,&quot; certainly not for women, unless it&#039;s specifically on his rather narrow terms. He, and apparently members of both groups he allegedly represents, also have a quite inaccurate understanding of female anatomy and pregnancy, but that lack of understanding is endemic to abortion opponents, and may simply be a smoke screen for the misogyny that so many abortion opponents display once we get past the usual &quot;pro-life&quot; rhetoric.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pesonal favorite line in the piece is, &#8220;Lawmakers did not press him on whether he supported unintended pregnancies for teen mothers as a method for boosting population.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mike Norton, of course is not at all interested in &#8220;defending freedom,&#8221; certainly not for women, unless it&#8217;s specifically on his rather narrow terms. He, and apparently members of both groups he allegedly represents, also have a quite inaccurate understanding of female anatomy and pregnancy, but that lack of understanding is endemic to abortion opponents, and may simply be a smoke screen for the misogyny that so many abortion opponents display once we get past the usual &#8220;pro-life&#8221; rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
