<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New board members join veterans on exchange board</title>
	<atom:link href="/2015/07/13/new-board-members-join-veterans-on-exchange-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/07/13/new-board-members-join-veterans-on-exchange-board/</link>
	<description>Colorado Health News and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephotoguy</title>
		<link>http://healthnewscolorado.org/2015/07/13/new-board-members-join-veterans-on-exchange-board/#comment-21637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thephotoguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthnewscolorado.org/?p=16806#comment-21637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see how the new members do – and how the whole program shapes up, given the recent SCOTUS decision – before passing further judgment. My own bias is that we&#039;d be better off with single-payer, government-run, health care (call it &quot;insurance&quot; if you want, but the whole point of said &quot;insurance&quot; ought to be to secure health care for people who need it, which is all of us at some point). But, with that bias in mind, I&#039;ll be interested in seeing how the board deals with the changing realities brought about by IT glitches and new quirks in funding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see how the new members do – and how the whole program shapes up, given the recent SCOTUS decision – before passing further judgment. My own bias is that we&#8217;d be better off with single-payer, government-run, health care (call it &#8220;insurance&#8221; if you want, but the whole point of said &#8220;insurance&#8221; ought to be to secure health care for people who need it, which is all of us at some point). But, with that bias in mind, I&#8217;ll be interested in seeing how the board deals with the changing realities brought about by IT glitches and new quirks in funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
